From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30144 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2008 22:55:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 30136 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jan 2008 22:55:15 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:54:55 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA4D9811D; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:54:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A90A98100; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:54:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JDSm4-0006n7-2q; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:54:52 -0500 Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:55:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Nick Roberts Cc: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [BUG:MI] -break-list doesn't list multiple breakpoints Message-ID: <20080111225452.GA26085@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Nick Roberts , Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <18310.38708.144719.374963@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <18311.57557.312425.107700@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18311.57557.312425.107700@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00298.txt.bz2 On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 10:34:13AM +1300, Nick Roberts wrote: > > > where presumably the !ui_out_is_mi_like_p (uiout) bit is there because the > > > testsuite failed without it, i.e., so that -break-insert only reports one > > > breakpoint (the CLI command "break" doesn't use > > > print_one_breakpoint_location). > > > > No, merely because I had no time to design MI interface. > > I'm not sure of the logic of committing an incomplete patch, but in any case > I think this needs to be fixed before the next release. I disagree. If someone needs this functionality in MI, they are invited to contribute it. Unless I'm completely mistaken, what happened previously in MI was even worse. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery