From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-53258-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 8736 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2008 21:14:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 8726 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jan 2008 21:14:41 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:14:22 +0000
Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m0BLDofA012694; 	Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:13:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id m0BLDnAF024595; 	Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:13:49 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:14:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200801112113.m0BLDnAF024595@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: eliz@gnu.org
CC: brobecker@adacore.com, schwab@suse.de, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <u3at4rrzy.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Fri, 11 	Jan 2008 23:07:13 +0200)
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA?] Should break FILE:LINENO skip prologue?
References: <20080109151745.GA13181@adacore.com> <200801092140.43362.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <200801101058.m0AAw7HA023877@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <200801101247.28736.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <1200001622.14654.29.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200801102208.m0AM8aDR023344@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20080111053547.GB12954@adacore.com> <200801111126.m0BBQQDB006618@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20080111182136.GD12954@adacore.com> <u3at4rrzy.fsf@gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00290.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:07:13 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> 
> > Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:21:36 -0800
> > From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> > 
> > Andreas, Eli, have your concerns been answered too? Just to recap,
> > the proposal is the following. Considering the following code:
> > 
> >    1.  int
> >    2.  my_procedure (...)
> >    3.  {
> >    4.    int local1 = ...;
> >    5.    int local2 = ...;
> >    6.    ...
> > 
> > The idea is that inserting a breakpoint on line 2 or 3 would be
> > equivalent to breaking on "my_procedure", which means that the
> > actual location will be line 4 (before the locals assignment
> > take place).
> 
> Actually, I didn't have concern regarding your original patch, but now
> that Mark raised the issue, I'm not sure what about his concerns.
> Suppose I do want to step through the function prolog -- how would I
> accomplish that after your changes?

Like you always did: break *my_procedure