From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8909 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2008 19:24:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 8895 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jan 2008 19:24:43 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:24:23 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DD49811D; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:24:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D99B98100; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:24:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JDPUK-0003pd-BA; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:24:20 -0500 Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:24:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Markus Deuling Cc: GDB Patches , Ulrich Weigand , Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [patch] Remove BITS_BIG_ENDIAN from defs.h Message-ID: <20080111192420.GA14709@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Markus Deuling , GDB Patches , Ulrich Weigand , Eli Zaretskii References: <4787B2E1.9060809@de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4787B2E1.9060809@de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00282.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 07:18:09PM +0100, Markus Deuling wrote: > So this macro is unnecessary. > -/* The bit byte-order has to do just with numbering of bits in > - debugging symbols and such. Conceptually, it's quite separate > - from byte/word byte order. */ You're dropping this distinction. Is it still a useful one? If so, please use a new bits_big_endian (current_gdbarch) instead. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery