From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17157 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2008 19:13:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 17112 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jan 2008 19:13:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:13:17 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE34F9811D; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:13:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9183E980E0; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:13:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JD2py-0000RN-RY; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:13:10 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:13:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Luis Machado Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Linux-specific ppc32 ABI Message-ID: <20080110191310.GA1440@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Luis Machado , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1199991624.3343.19.camel@gargoyle> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1199991624.3343.19.camel@gargoyle> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00245.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 05:00:24PM -0200, Luis Machado wrote: > I presume it's better to just write new Linux-specific code in case we > need to treat those ABI's differently in the future. What other target(s) use the existing function? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery