From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25120 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2008 19:16:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 25107 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jan 2008 19:16:01 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:15:38 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2B898223; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 19:15:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED7398216; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 19:15:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JCgOm-00056a-1D; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:15:36 -0500 Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:16:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jim Blandy Cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA?] Should break FILE:LINENO skip prologue? Message-ID: <20080109191535.GB19569@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jim Blandy , Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20080109151745.GA13181@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00207.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 11:10:49AM -0800, Jim Blandy wrote: > > [1]: I think we have made some progress with parameter/variable > > tracking with DWARF, but I think it's not activated by default > > and we also still support platforms where DWARF is not available. > > What is "not activated by default", exactly? Is it in GCC? In GDB? > Where in GDB? GCC does not generate the necessary location lists at -O0. Eric B. tried at one point; I don't remember if there were bugs, or just unacceptable bloat. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery