From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17012 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2008 21:32:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 17004 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jan 2008 21:32:39 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:32:08 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 029D698216; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 21:32:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E061798022; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 21:32:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JCM3J-0002vH-VS; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:32:05 -0500 Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 21:32:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Aleksandar Ristovski Cc: dje@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Ryan Mansfield Subject: Re: [RFA] patch for DW_AT_comp_dir/DW_AT_name vs .debug_line inco nsistencies Message-ID: <20080108213205.GA11216@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Aleksandar Ristovski , dje@google.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Ryan Mansfield References: <2F6320727174C448A52CEB63D85D11F40A6F@nova.ott.qnx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2F6320727174C448A52CEB63D85D11F40A6F@nova.ott.qnx.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00165.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 04:23:29PM -0500, Aleksandar Ristovski wrote: > I don't know how do you interpret this, but I would say the output from my > example produced by 3.3.5 is also correct. I do not see how the text you quoted has any bearing on this situation. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery