From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28394 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2008 21:09:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 28383 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jan 2008 21:09:42 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:09:22 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D59CB98216; Mon, 7 Jan 2008 21:09:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5C098144; Mon, 7 Jan 2008 21:09:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JBzDj-0007JC-M6; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:09:19 -0500 Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:09:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Vladimir Prus , cgd@google.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Try2: Inform about new thread in a single place. Message-ID: <20080107210919.GA28042@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Vladimir Prus , cgd@google.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200712212104.37823.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200712212215.43869.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200801071833.51795.vladimir@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00117.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 11:02:18PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Yes, as far as I'm concerned. Me too. As far as gdbserver is concerned, no, the test should not fail. linux-dp.exp records this as an UNSUPPORTED case and I think that's right. Try [isremote target] to detect it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery