From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14935 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2008 19:33:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 14927 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Jan 2008 19:33:13 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 19:32:39 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC8898120; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 19:32:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320399801D; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 19:32:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JAsHU-0007Iu-A2; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:32:36 -0500 Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 19:33:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Aleksandar Ristovski Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Joel Brobecker , Ryan Mansfield Subject: Re: [patch] IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH to handle both DOS and POSIX path st yles Message-ID: <20080104193236.GA28016@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Aleksandar Ristovski , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Joel Brobecker , Ryan Mansfield References: <2F6320727174C448A52CEB63D85D11F40A4C@nova.ott.qnx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2F6320727174C448A52CEB63D85D11F40A4C@nova.ott.qnx.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00063.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 02:25:50PM -0500, Aleksandar Ristovski wrote: > Oops... the patch I submitted has a few typos. Sorry about that. Here is the > correct one. > > This patch introduces new IS_DIR_SEPARATOR_? And IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH_? Macros. > > Old macros IS_DIR_SEPARATOR and IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH continue to be configured > host dependent. > > Please see http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2008-01/msg00021.html for details on > why this patch. This looks OK to me, but the file belongs to libiberty - please send it to gcc-patches, mention libiberty in the subject line, and DJ or Ian will look at it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery