From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25675 invoked by alias); 29 Dec 2007 03:42:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 25666 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Dec 2007 03:42:42 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Dec 2007 03:42:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1BF2A963E; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:42:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id K0GKPaeVOGtP; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:42:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E462A963B; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:42:35 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0BA6D36A4A3; Sat, 29 Dec 2007 07:42:28 +0400 (RET) Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 03:50:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: PR/2386 [2/2]: MinGW attach to process without an exec file Message-ID: <20071229034228.GB30002@adacore.com> References: <47744F9C.8040604@portugalmail.pt> <20071228013457.GB7602@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <477579E0.5010809@portugalmail.pt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <477579E0.5010809@portugalmail.pt> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00443.txt.bz2 > Then we should document it somewhere, that we don't support > Windows 9x anymore. Maybe in the NEWS file ? I personally don't mind declaring the end of support for 9x and NT. But, we don't necessarily have to be that extreme - We could still support Windows 9x but with limitations. Being able to attach the debugger to a PID without specifying the executable is not a critical feature, and if the rest is known to work, it's still a very fine debugger. BTW: Pedro, thanks very much for your work on the Windows port. -- Joel