From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10981 invoked by alias); 23 Dec 2007 05:36:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 10972 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Dec 2007 05:36:03 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Dec 2007 05:35:55 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE68E2A96C0 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2007 00:35:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ifr+ip4P-noX for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2007 00:35:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5E32A96BA for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2007 00:35:53 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 08F96E7ACA; Sun, 23 Dec 2007 09:35:46 +0400 (RET) Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 06:41:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] continue stepping if landed in new range of same line Message-ID: <20071223053546.GV6154@adacore.com> References: <20071219075903.GA6184@adacore.com> <20071219141812.GA21072@caradoc.them.org> <20071220052617.GE6154@adacore.com> <20071220140023.GB7244@caradoc.them.org> <20071221060730.GM6184@adacore.com> <20071221132401.GA22244@caradoc.them.org> <20071222060137.GS6154@adacore.com> <20071222173903.GA22038@caradoc.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071222173903.GA22038@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00405.txt.bz2 > > 2007-12-22 Joel Brobecker > > > > * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Remove code that made us > > stop when stepping into the last line of the current function. > > > > Tested on x86-linux, no regression. > > This is OK as far as I'm concerned. And I am always in favor of > simplifying handle_inferior_event. Great! I have checked this change in. Thanks, Daniel. -- Joel