From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30163 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2007 21:08:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 30153 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Dec 2007 21:08:11 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pauline.vellum.cz (HELO pauline.vellum.cz) (89.250.243.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 21:08:07 +0000 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pauline.vellum.cz (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id lBML82EW027524; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 22:08:02 +0100 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lBML828Q021111; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 22:08:02 +0100 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id lBML82JR021110; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 22:08:02 +0100 Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 21:35:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [patch] Basic DW_TAG_interface_type support Message-ID: <20071222210801.GA21050@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20071222192726.GA18166@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20071222200711.GA29494@caradoc.them.org> <20071222201440.GA19400@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20071222205148.GA31891@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071222205148.GA31891@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00402.txt.bz2 On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 21:51:48 +0100, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: ... > I don't see why you couldn't write one that would work OK on multiple > architectures; the dw2-basic.S example already includes a type. OK, some basic DWARF2 info is arch-independent, I see now. Just sorry recoding it whole mostly by hand is IMO not worth the effort. No problem if the testcase is not acceptable upstream, I have some doubts it is useful. > Anyway, the code patch is OK; Committed. Thanks, Jan