From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18449 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2007 05:30:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 18441 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Dec 2007 05:30:47 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 05:30:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B372A9699 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:30:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id B-1YEaqAU9N3 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:30:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D632A968E for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:30:40 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B4EA0E7ACA; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 09:29:47 +0400 (RET) Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 06:02:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: ping: [RFA/testsuite] ptype of structs with anonymous type fields Message-ID: <20071222052947.GR6154@adacore.com> References: <20070828175128.GC3874@adacore.com> <20071221062750.GL6154@adacore.com> <20071221132016.GA22218@caradoc.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071221132016.GA22218@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00388.txt.bz2 > > Do we agree that this is the expected behavior? If yes, then I think > > I can commit the testsuite change, since this part is relatively > > straightforward. But I want to make sure that we do have the correct > > behavior! > > Expected, certainly. Test looks fine to me. Cool, thanks for confirming it. I checked the patch in. -- Joel