From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4705 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2007 13:20:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 4693 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Dec 2007 13:20:29 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:20:20 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F6C98258; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:20:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8459498236; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:20:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J5hnV-0005mj-0e; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 08:20:17 -0500 Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:24:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: ping: [RFA/testsuite] ptype of structs with anonymous type fields Message-ID: <20071221132016.GA22218@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20070828175128.GC3874@adacore.com> <20071221062750.GL6154@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071221062750.GL6154@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00369.txt.bz2 On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 10:27:50AM +0400, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Do we agree that this is the expected behavior? If yes, then I think > I can commit the testsuite change, since this part is relatively > straightforward. But I want to make sure that we do have the correct > behavior! Expected, certainly. Test looks fine to me. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery