From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29526 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2007 22:57:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 29516 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Dec 2007 22:57:29 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:57:21 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B82298129; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:57:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1B69811F; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:57:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J42QB-0002Ie-Ca; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:57:19 -0500 Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:01:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, ukleinek@informatik.uni-freiburg.de, jimb@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: [rfa] Clarify remote protocol RLE example Message-ID: <20071216225719.GA8814@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, ukleinek@informatik.uni-freiburg.de, jimb@codesourcery.com References: <20071103161956.GA7885@caradoc.them.org> <20071103191822.GA17820@caradoc.them.org> <20071216203035.GD22905@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00243.txt.bz2 On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 12:48:20AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > When I put everything together, I came up with the attached patch. Is > > this clearer? > > Yes, thanks. Thanks again for your help! I checked in this version. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery