From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24461 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2007 20:56:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 24360 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Dec 2007 20:56:15 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:56:09 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A574098129; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:56:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81BAD9811F; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:56:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J40Ws-0000Hz-MV; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:56:06 -0500 Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:59:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: FX Coudert Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, "fortran@gcc.gnu.org List" Subject: Re: Name of Fortran intrinsic types Message-ID: <20071216205606.GH22905@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: FX Coudert , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, "fortran@gcc.gnu.org List" References: <6E63F9C5-BBBE-4C8D-8FCB-21B6ECF18580@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6E63F9C5-BBBE-4C8D-8FCB-21B6ECF18580@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00222.txt.bz2 On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 08:55:51PM +0000, FX Coudert wrote: > Built and regtested on x86_64-linux (there are a fair number of FAILures > in the testsuite, but none in the Fortran area, so maybe it's the normal > state?). OK. Do you have commit access already (membership in the src group)? If not, please ask overseers@ for it; CC me and say I approved it. Then add yourself to gdb/MAINTAINERS in the obvious place. Yes, a number of failures are normal. I dislike this, but it's hard to stay on top of all the different configurations. Any time you want to fix one of them or add appropriate XFAILs for conditions outside of GDB's control, be my guest and I'll be happy to help. Until then, I recommend running the testsuite with and without your patches. Also, if you could find a way to put your patches in plain text instead of application/octet-stream... thanks. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery