From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29387 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2007 19:47:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 29377 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Dec 2007 19:47:32 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:47:25 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B2B298052; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:47:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AD3798022; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:47:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J3GVF-0000az-DN; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:47:21 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:55:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vladimir Prus Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Inform about new thread in a single place. Message-ID: <20071214194721.GA2158@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus , Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200712142009.08263.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200712142207.19754.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200712141920.lBEJKVI1027649@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <200712142240.20597.vladimir@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200712142240.20597.vladimir@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00195.txt.bz2 On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 10:40:20PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote: > Here's the revised patch. OK? linux-nat.c, linux-thread-db.c, and win32-nat.c all print only under control of a verbose flag. While we're unifying the code we should unify the behavior too - should this always be shown, or not? The call site in linux-nat.c never received the verbose flag, so it has not been printing for a while. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery