From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13762 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2007 17:14:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 13754 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Dec 2007 17:14:16 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:14:05 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1D998052; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:14:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFA598022; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:14:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J3E6r-0006j7-TS; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:14:01 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:43:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Remove target_pid_or_tid_to_str. Message-ID: <20071214171401.GA25841@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200712142007.58984.vladimir@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200712142007.58984.vladimir@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00189.txt.bz2 On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 08:07:58PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > This macros has added in 1999 and used by > config/pa/nm-hppah.h. The latter file was itself > deleted in 2004, so now target_pid_or_tid_to_str > is always the same as target_pid_to_str. > > OK? > > - Volodya > > * gdb/target.h (target_pid_or_tid_to_str): Remove. > * gdb/infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): > Use target_pid_to_str instead of target_pid_or_tid_to_str. > (normal_stop): Likewise. OK. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery