From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24601 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2007 14:08:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 24590 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Dec 2007 14:08:09 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:07:53 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F9D98054; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:07:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE17098022; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:07:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J3BCe-0003tp-BH; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:07:48 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:06:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: MI/CLI breakpoint handling code duplication Message-ID: <20071214140748.GA14688@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200711081325.59918.ghost@cs.msu.su> <200712140926.49689.ghost@cs.msu.su> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200712140926.49689.ghost@cs.msu.su> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00185.txt.bz2 On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 10:26:49AM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote: > Ping? This patch is pure refactoring which is basis for > the 'pending breakpoint in MI' patch. Given that the patch > is not supposed to change any behaviour and causes no regression, > I'd hope it should be easy to review :-) > > I reattach the patch in case the original email is already lost. OK. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery