From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28389 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2007 15:29:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 28381 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Dec 2007 15:29:46 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 15:29:39 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B907F980A7 for ; Sat, 8 Dec 2007 15:29:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301C7980A5 for ; Sat, 8 Dec 2007 15:29:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J11cV-0001IS-5T for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 10:29:35 -0500 Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 18:14:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc] Multiple process support in gdbserver Message-ID: <20071208152935.GA4888@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20071207212352.GB32256@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 01:41:40PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > -was compiled with the correct sysroot using @code{--with-system-root}). > > +was compiled with the correct sysroot using @code{--with-sysroot}). > > Does this mean the previous wording was just plain wrong, or are you > changing the option's spelling? It was just wrong. > @ref does not produce a "see", so the above is wrong. Why did you > replace @xref in the first place, it looks allright here (except that > you need a comma after the right brace)? Just trying to fix the info build; I'll add the comma instead. > > +* The GDB remote stub, gdbserver, now supports run and attach in > > +extended-remote mode. > > Is "extended-remote mode" a known term? If not, we should probably > explain it, or else replace it with a more plain-language description > of it. I think it is a sufficiently known term; it corresponds to "target extended-remote", which is documented. Thanks for the comments! I will update the patch (next week). -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery