From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5266 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2007 17:30:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 5256 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Dec 2007 17:30:19 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:30:08 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080ED2AB2DA; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 12:30:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id vQKifD5nyXnt; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 12:30:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9172AB2D9; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 12:30:06 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 43682E7ACA; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 09:30:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:30:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jim Blandy Cc: Jan Kratochvil , a@gnat.com, Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] Parse DW_AT_ranges into PSYMTABS (for childless CU, for vDSO32) Message-ID: <20071201173004.GA14306@adacore.com> References: <20071009180246.GA26829@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20071009181701.GA30757@caradoc.them.org> <20071009185434.GA27810@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20071009185931.GA1220@caradoc.them.org> <20071124154339.GA14913@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20071130111021.GA17867@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20071130145613.GA5941@caradoc.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2 > > Jim, can we get your addrmap changes in as they are, instead of > > working on a representation change (which was the state when they were > > briefly discussed, in October)? After that, it's simple to solve this > > problem more accurately by using addrmaps for symtabs too, not just > > blocks. > > Sure, if Joel doesn't object. Not at all, I remember having some questions, but I liked the idea. -- Joel