From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-52425-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 4303 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2007 12:50:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 4291 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Nov 2007 12:50:32 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:50:28 +0000
Received: (qmail 16747 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2007 12:50:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO 172.16.unknown.plus.ru) (vladimir@127.0.0.2)   by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 28 Nov 2007 12:50:26 -0000
From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com>
To: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Stop infrun from tracking breakpoint insertion status.
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:50:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
References: <200711271814.lARIECVU018918@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <200711271814.lARIECVU018918@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200711281550.19335.vladimir@codesourcery.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00521.txt.bz2

On Tuesday 27 November 2007 21:14:12 Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
> 
> > There were in fact two distinct problems. The first was
> > in my previous patch to document infrun logic -- while the
> > patch was meant to have no logic change, the case of 
> > stepping over breakpoint using software single step was
> > messed up. This patch fixes the problem -- it was tested
> > on arm-linux/qemu, which uses software single step, with
> > no test result changes. OK?
> 
> Ah, right.  Sorry for missing that.
> 
> >         * infrun.c (resume): Set right thread
> >         even if stepping over breakpoint using software
> >         single step.
> 
> This is OK.

Thanks. This one is checked in.

- Volodya