From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15374 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2007 18:14:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 15366 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Nov 2007 18:14:23 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate2.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate2.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.151) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:14:16 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate2.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lARIECRj067366 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:14:12 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id lARIECGs2818162 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:14:12 +0100 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id lARIECPC018924 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:14:12 +0100 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id lARIECVU018918; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:14:12 +0100 Message-Id: <200711271814.lARIECVU018918@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:14:12 +0100 Subject: Re: [RFA] Stop infrun from tracking breakpoint insertion status. To: vladimir@codesourcery.com (Vladimir Prus) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:14:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <200711272049.42766.vladimir@codesourcery.com> from "Vladimir Prus" at Nov 27, 2007 08:49:41 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00512.txt.bz2 Vladimir Prus wrote: > There were in fact two distinct problems. The first was > in my previous patch to document infrun logic -- while the > patch was meant to have no logic change, the case of > stepping over breakpoint using software single step was > messed up. This patch fixes the problem -- it was tested > on arm-linux/qemu, which uses software single step, with > no test result changes. OK? Ah, right. Sorry for missing that. > * infrun.c (resume): Set right thread > even if stepping over breakpoint using software > single step. This is OK. Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com