From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1167 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2007 22:14:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 1159 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Nov 2007 22:14:07 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:14:00 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F0298349; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:13:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5451980A5; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:13:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1IwPjh-0005OA-QR; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:13:57 -0500 Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:14:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Carlos Eduardo Seo Subject: Re: [patch] XLF Fortran: Remove an inappropriate complaint [Re: XLF Fortran arrays test] Message-ID: <20071125221357.GA20375@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jan Kratochvil , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Carlos Eduardo Seo References: <473DD96D.5020900@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20071116194448.GA32395@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <4741A077.9050900@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20071123015957.GA3202@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20071123021120.GA11797@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20071123163125.GA23275@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <4747086C.3070100@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20071123172104.GA23776@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20071125145555.GB30778@caradoc.them.org> <20071125221037.GA6297@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071125221037.GA6297@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00478.txt.bz2 On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 11:10:37PM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > The code below the > > complaint is creating a signed integer type the size of an address. > > So your patch is OK. Thanks. > > I see now my point is wrong. The code still violates (notwithstanding of any > of my Fortran patches) the DWARF standard as it ignores > DW_AT_lower_bound/DW_AT_upper_bound/DW_AT_count with DW_FORM_ref* which may > specify the intended type through another DIE (as can be seen in DWARF3 D.2.2). I'm confused. What's wrong? The patch I was replying to removed the complaint call. That seems fine, since it isn't related to DW_FORM_ref* support. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery