On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:05:48 +0100, Carlos Eduardo Seo wrote:
...
> The only strange behavior is that when I set a breakpoint, I get this
> message:
> 
> During symbol reading, DW_AT_type missing from DW_TAG_subrange_type.

This code was there already before my changes.  And the XLF output really
misses DW_AT_type for DW_TAG_subrange_type.  But it should be correct:
	http://dwarf.freestandards.org/Dwarf3.pdf
	5.12 Subrange Type Entries
	The subrange entry may have a DW_AT_type attribute to describe the type
	of object, called the basis type, of whose values this subrange is
	a subset.

"may have" should not produce a `complaint' category message as it is not
a standard violation.

Providing a patch but I do not know much more about it.


Regards,
Jan