From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14596 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2007 17:28:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 14588 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Nov 2007 17:27:59 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:27:53 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDAA98367; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:27:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E0A9833F; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:27:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1IuAPX-0002Sa-1O; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:27:51 -0500 Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:28:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc] [0/9] Multi-target support Message-ID: <20071119172751.GA9441@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich Weigand , Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <001101c82ac9$c9ca71a0$5d5f54e0$@u-strasbg.fr> <200711191724.lAJHOOqx016526@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200711191724.lAJHOOqx016526@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00370.txt.bz2 On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 06:24:24PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > > Adding --enable-64-bit-bfd I still needed to add WERROR_CFLAGS="" > > because I got warnings in win32-nat.c, which implicitly assumes that > > CORE_ADDR is 32 bit long. > > Now this is a bug in win32-nat.c, which would have already shown up > if you attempted to build a regular win32 -> amd64-linux (for example) > cross-debugger. Well, no - you wouldn't get win32-nat.c in that case. It would show up if you build a native Windows GDB with --enable-64-bit-bfd though. > Hmm, this looks like another pre-existing problem. Unfortunately, > I'm not very familiar with yacc/bison details ... Yes, this seems to be a bug in the recently added Modula-2 support. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery