From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-52107-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 860 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2007 19:09:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 848 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Nov 2007 19:09:02 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 19:09:00 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) 	by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56EDA2AA394 	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Fri,  9 Nov 2007 14:06:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) 	by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) 	with LMTP id cwo6sR54WwpZ for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; 	Fri,  9 Nov 2007 14:06:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) 	by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF662AA2FF 	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Fri,  9 Nov 2007 14:06:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) 	id 62E8CE7ACA; Fri,  9 Nov 2007 11:06:52 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 19:09:00 -0000
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] new setting to not-print frame arguments values
Message-ID: <20071109190652.GA4339@adacore.com>
References: <20071108011940.GI3911@adacore.com> <u8x59qslc.fsf@gnu.org> <20071108043830.GA20791@caradoc.them.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20071108043830.GA20791@caradoc.them.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00203.txt.bz2

> > I'm okay with the idea.
> 
> Me too.  Something looked odd with your indentation in
> print_frame_args, but otherwise the patch looks OK, too.

Thanks everyone for the feedback. The oddness, I believe, comes from
the ($@^$#%) tabs - The extra leading character in the diff sometimes
makes it look odd. However, there was one place at the end of the patch
where I forgot to convert spaces into tabs, so I fixed it.

The patch is now in. Documentation and testcase coming up shortly.

-- 
Joel

PS: God, I hate tabs...