From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-52074-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 11101 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2007 15:00:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 11092 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Nov 2007 15:00:51 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 15:00:47 +0000
Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D52598353; 	Thu,  8 Nov 2007 15:00:45 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) 	by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F0798258; 	Thu,  8 Nov 2007 15:00:45 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) 	(envelope-from <drow@caradoc.them.org>) 	id 1Iq8s8-0007lM-IW; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 10:00:44 -0500
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 15:00:00 -0000
From: 'Daniel Jacobowitz' <drow@false.org>
To: Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
Cc: 'Andreas Schwab' <schwab@suse.de>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Trying to fix testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-sse.exp pattern 	problem
Message-ID: <20071108150044.GA29500@caradoc.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>, 	'Andreas Schwab' <schwab@suse.de>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
References: <20071107151120.GC20821@caradoc.them.org> <002f01c821ec$ba48f0c0$2edad240$@u-strasbg.fr> <jeprylt3tw.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <003c01c821f5$cce1e6c0$66a5b440$@u-strasbg.fr> <20071108123824.GA13666@caradoc.them.org> <004b01c8220b$93eda9b0$bbc8fd10$@u-strasbg.fr> <20071108134240.GA17292@caradoc.them.org> <004c01c82211$a4b43100$ee1c9300$@u-strasbg.fr> <20071108142727.GA19455@caradoc.them.org> <005301c82216$cd888400$68998c00$@u-strasbg.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <005301c82216$cd888400$68998c00$@u-strasbg.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00170.txt.bz2

On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 03:51:11PM +0100, Pierre Muller wrote:
> > printf 'send_user "[regexp {[\r\n]*(.* = 1{1,}2{1,}.*)[\r\n]+\(gdb\) $}
> > {print 1122233\r\n$2 = 1122233\r\n(gdb) }]\n"' | expect
> It does succeed indeed... 
> > It should print 1; if it prints 0 for you that would be somewhere to
> > start.
> 
>   But if I put the send_user part inside my test.exp
> it returns 0!

That's not surprising.  The quoting rules are different.  Try:

send_user "[regexp {[\r\n]*(.* = 1{1,}2{1,}.*)[\r\n]+\(gdb\) $} \
	  "print 1122233\r\n\$2 = 1122233\r\n(gdb) "]\n"

The quotes instead of braces let literal \r\n get into the test string.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery