From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23698 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2007 04:38:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 23690 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Nov 2007 04:38:35 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 04:38:33 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B7A698353 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 04:38:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F7D9833F for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 04:38:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1Ipz9y-0005Tw-6i for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 23:38:30 -0500 Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 04:38:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] new setting to not-print frame arguments values Message-ID: <20071108043830.GA20791@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20071108011940.GI3911@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00153.txt.bz2 On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 06:17:03AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I'm okay with the idea. Me too. Something looked odd with your indentation in print_frame_args, but otherwise the patch looks OK, too. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery