From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7160 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2007 22:17:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 7151 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Nov 2007 22:17:35 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:17:33 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB4F98353 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2007 22:17:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A412E9833F for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2007 22:17:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1IptDG-0008F7-Fs for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:17:30 -0500 Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:17:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc] Stop unlikely "run"'s earlier Message-ID: <20071107221730.GA31647@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20071107211833.GA28200@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00144.txt.bz2 On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:06:16AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I'm okay with the change, but how do you feel about updating the docs > as well? Should we? I just looked at the description of "run" in the manual. If anything, this patch brings GDB better in line with its manual, but if you can think of a way to describe the difference I'm all ears. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery