From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 654 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2007 02:54:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 643 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Nov 2007 02:54:00 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 02:53:59 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C9E98353; Wed, 7 Nov 2007 02:53:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6559830E; Wed, 7 Nov 2007 02:53:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1Ipb3E-0000Ve-4D; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 21:53:56 -0500 Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 02:54:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Brooks Moses Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch][gdb,etc] Add configure option to disable building internal documentation. Message-ID: <20071107025356.GA1752@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Brooks Moses , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <4730F626.806@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4730F626.806@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00103.txt.bz2 On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 03:17:58PM -0800, Brooks Moses wrote: > (I also have a corresponding patch for libiberty; my understanding is > that this should go to GCC first, and then it will get merged to > src/libiberty, yes?) Yes. > Tested by building gdb with various iterations of this flag, and > confirming that it works as expected and doesn't break the build. Ok to > commit? No, sorry - as came up after you posted this, the GNU make requirement is not OK for GDB or binutils. Could you revise? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery