From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-51963-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 12544 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2007 14:15:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 12536 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Nov 2007 14:15:56 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:15:53 +0000
Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lA5EFnmT018835; 	Mon, 5 Nov 2007 15:15:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id lA5EFmvm024502; 	Mon, 5 Nov 2007 15:15:48 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:15:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200711051415.lA5EFmvm024502@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: deuling@de.ibm.com
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, uweigand@de.ibm.com
In-reply-to: <472F0BF2.9010801@de.ibm.com> (message from Markus Deuling on 	Mon, 05 Nov 2007 13:26:26 +0100)
Subject: Re: [rfc]: Macros in gdbtypes
References:  <472F0BF2.9010801@de.ibm.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00059.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 13:26:26 +0100
> From: Markus Deuling <deuling@de.ibm.com>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> in gdbtypes.h are some macros based on current_gdbarch (eg. builtin_type_void_data_ptr). This patch
> replaces builtin_type_void_data_ptr by its definition in the source tree and then replaces current_gdbarch
> by appropriate methods were possible.
> 
> This patch is **NOT** tested and shall no be committed right now. 
> 
> Before proceeding I want to hear from you if that's a way to go for those macros or if you would prefer s.th. else to get rid
> of the current_gdbarch's in gdbtypes.h

Please no!  I think it obfuscates the code to much.  It's probably
better to change builtin_type_void_data_ptr to take a gdbarch
argument.