From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5244 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2007 21:36:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 5236 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Oct 2007 21:36:53 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:36:52 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B9598348; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:36:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1D5981F1; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:36:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1InLF3-0000BH-9s; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:36:49 -0400 Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:54:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA/gdbserver] use $(SHELL) instead of "sh" Message-ID: <20071031213649.GA672@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20071031211427.GN5265@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071031211427.GN5265@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00876.txt.bz2 On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 05:14:27PM -0400, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hello, > > Something that I noticed a few weeks back when I was trying to build > the GDB server from a Solaris host. The system "sh" is not good enough > to run regdat.sh. Attached is a patch that removes the hard-coded > call to "sh" by a call to whatever SHELL is set to. > > 2007-10-31 Joel Brobecker > > * Makefile.in: Use $(SHELL) instead of "sh" to call regdat.sh. > > Tested by rebuilding the gdbserver on x86-linux. > OK to commit? Sure. Sorry, I tried to make the script sufficiently portable... -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery