From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9518 invoked by alias); 29 Oct 2007 20:12:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 9467 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Oct 2007 20:12:57 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:12:55 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6BEA98348 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:12:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3C498347 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:12:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1Imayj-0005cR-11 for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:12:53 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:19:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] printf support for DFP values Message-ID: <20071029201252.GA21583@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1193449497.6950.22.camel@localhost> <1193669215.4800.10.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00775.txt.bz2 On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 10:05:41PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Luis Machado > > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:46:55 -0300 > > > > > > - double_arg, long_double_arg > > > > + double_arg, long_double_arg, decfloat_arg > > > > > > You are using decfloat_arg unconditionally, but I don't see it defined > > > anywhere in today's CVS. Am I missing something? > > > > decfloat_arg is being defined in an "enum" structure together with the > > other values (double_arg, long_double_arg, int_arg etc). > > Defined where? I probably missed some file, because I searched for it > in the current CVS and couldn't find, and neither do I see it in your > patch. The above is a definition: enum argclass { int_arg, long_arg, long_long_arg, ptr_arg, string_arg, double_arg, long_double_arg }; -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery