From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-51636-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14776 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2007 19:40:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 14767 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Oct 2007 19:40:32 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:40:28 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) 	by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DEF42AAC60; 	Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:40:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) 	by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) 	with LMTP id JhjdweFMYh17; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:40:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) 	by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBBE02AAC9C; 	Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:40:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) 	id DA23DE7AC8; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:04:00 -0000
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, tausq@debian.org
Subject: Re: [RFA/doco] document hppa64-hpux support state
Message-ID: <20071024194024.GN764@adacore.com>
References: <20071024191211.GF11797@adacore.com> <20071024193445.GF10943@caradoc.them.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20071024193445.GF10943@caradoc.them.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00614.txt.bz2

> > following our discovery that the hppa64-hpux debugger seems to be broken,
> > I am attaching the following patch for review.
> 
> ENOPATCH.

Yeah, doing too many things at the same time again. It's good, since
the patch is withdrawn following Eli's observations.

I'm currently building off the gdb-6.7 branch to check whether
it's broken as well or not. Will come up with a NEWS entry ASAP.

-- 
Joel