From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30300 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2007 19:21:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 30289 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Oct 2007 19:21:27 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:21:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D442AAFB9; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:21:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id M8wl5prO4uAW; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:21:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F12A2AAE50; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:21:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 648C3E7AC8; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:21:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:23:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: uweigand@de.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [0/8] solib handler rework Message-ID: <20071024192120.GM764@adacore.com> References: <20071022180819.GF764@adacore.com> <200710222025.l9MKPCNT026151@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <20071024060548.GK764@adacore.com> <20071024063810.GL764@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00606.txt.bz2 > > The pa64-hpux debugger is pretty broken, so we can't verify them any > > further. We should probably document that fact somewhere, maybe in > > the NEWS file? > > Yes, NEWS would be a good place, IMO. Argh! Our emails crossed, I just posted a patch for PROBLEMS. Which one would you prefer? Both maybe? -- Joel