From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26999 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2007 15:46:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 26991 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Oct 2007 15:46:46 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:46:44 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E6E9833F; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:46:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0794A981F2; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:46:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1IkiRM-0000I5-OH; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:46:40 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:00:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Luis Machado Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc, rfa/doc] Multi-threaded watchpoint improvements Message-ID: <20071024154640.GA949@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Luis Machado , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20070916183949.GA23966@caradoc.them.org> <20071001002015.GA15835@caradoc.them.org> <1193241369.4316.4.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1193241369.4316.4.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00584.txt.bz2 On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 12:56:09PM -0300, Luis Machado wrote: > Daniel, > > Somehow this patch has broken ppc software/hardware watchpoints. They > won't trigger anymore, no matter what, but they're still being correctly > created though. I'm not sure exactly where the problem is, but they > trigger when i revert this patch. It might be something on infrun.c > involving stopped_by_watchpoint. > > I'll keep on looking at the code. If you need further details, i can > provide it. They'd help. I know I tested on PowerPC before checking it in, and things still seemed OK. And it should not affect software watchpoints at all. I'd recommend starting with "set debug infrun 1". -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery