From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14755 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2007 01:05:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 14746 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Oct 2007 01:05:57 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 01:05:54 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467609833D; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 01:05:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D099829E; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 01:05:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1Ijljq-0003BI-OS; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:05:50 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 01:20:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Luis Machado , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] Backtrace prints wrong argument value Message-ID: <20071022010550.GA12211@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , Luis Machado , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <1190034278.4651.10.camel@localhost> <20070917131542.GA12835@caradoc.them.org> <1190035779.4651.16.camel@localhost> <20070917133700.GA14300@caradoc.them.org> <1190037624.4651.24.camel@localhost> <20070917140416.GA15635@caradoc.them.org> <1190049306.4651.42.camel@localhost> <20070917171821.GA2107@caradoc.them.org> <1192997096.5584.2.camel@localhost> <20071021232837.GD6180@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071021232837.GD6180@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00480.txt.bz2 On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 04:28:37PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > > > 2007-09-17 Luis Machado > > > > > > > > * rs6000-tdep.c (ppc_dwarf2_frame_init_reg): New function. > > > > (rs6000_gdbarch_init): Install ppc_dwarf2_frame_init_reg as > > > > default dwarf2_frame_set_init_reg function. > > > > > > OK. > > > > > > > Thanks. I've commited this now. > > Luis asked me whether he could commit to the branch. I looked at the > patch, and it seems pretty safe to me. Does anyone have reservations > about this going to the branch? Daniel? Sounds fine to me. There are now a pile (three, I believe) of PRs about Solaris build failures. Is there someone familiar with Solaris who could take a look at them? I think we have one at work that I could borrow for this, but it'll take me a while. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery