From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5672 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2007 19:47:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 5661 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Oct 2007 19:47:16 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:47:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7172AC239; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:47:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 3iDdT-90IM9d; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:47:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6501E2AC232; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:47:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5BC88E7A13; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:00:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: Ulrich Weigand , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Support of gdb for Windows 64 native systems Message-ID: <20071017194708.GC2068@adacore.com> References: <200710161823.l9GIN1Vu023163@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <47165541.90206@portugalmail.pt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47165541.90206@portugalmail.pt> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00441.txt.bz2 > >>I will double-check this when I get a chance, but I think the current > >>patches should provide relatively complete support. From what I could > >>tell, the "attach" feature might not be working (apparently, we need > >>to define the "ATTACH_NO_WAIT" macro), and we have to implement IO > >>redirection / process creation through a shell. I think these are > >>the only two major features that we should be missing. > > > > Attaching already works nicelly. Since you've played with the resulting debugger, how would you categorize the current support? I think it's good enough for a NEWS entry already. Do you know of anything else that's missing except using a shell to do the process creation (which will also allow us to do IO redirection)? -- Joel