From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11239 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2007 16:59:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 11231 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Oct 2007 16:59:45 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:59:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38ED32AC680; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:59:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id dED1UMC9p2iQ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:59:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007C12AC67F; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:59:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EEDDEE7B58; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:59:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:23:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Support of gdb for Windows 64 native systems Message-ID: <20071016165938.GA2068@adacore.com> References: <20071015185451.GA3934@caradoc.them.org> <4713F838.9050104@portugalmail.pt> <20071016042121.GA22246@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4053daab0710160053v56c78dael4a8c732c3b7d70d7@mail.gmail.com> <20071016135619.GA24389@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4053daab0710160735w6eff34dci7ddd4ea117a1937a@mail.gmail.com> <20071016144131.GA15352@caradoc.them.org> <20071016155624.GB24561@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00426.txt.bz2 > > I think that's a good idea too but does this really get us to full MinGW > > support? > > I agree: if MinGW support is incomplete, let's defer the NEWS entry > until it is. I will double-check this when I get a chance, but I think the current patches should provide relatively complete support. From what I could tell, the "attach" feature might not be working (apparently, we need to define the "ATTACH_NO_WAIT" macro), and we have to implement IO redirection / process creation through a shell. I think these are the only two major features that we should be missing. -- Joel