From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15496 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2007 15:56:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 15488 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Oct 2007 15:56:27 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-70-20-17-24.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO ednor.cgf.cx) (70.20.17.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:56:25 +0000 Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 257A52B353; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:56:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:13:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Support of gdb for Windows 64 native systems Message-ID: <20071016155624.GB24561@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20071014222252.GA13023@caradoc.them.org> <20071015184525.GI14543@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20071015185451.GA3934@caradoc.them.org> <4713F838.9050104@portugalmail.pt> <20071016042121.GA22246@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4053daab0710160053v56c78dael4a8c732c3b7d70d7@mail.gmail.com> <20071016135619.GA24389@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4053daab0710160735w6eff34dci7ddd4ea117a1937a@mail.gmail.com> <20071016144131.GA15352@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071016144131.GA15352@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00423.txt.bz2 On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:41:31AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 03:35:33PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: >> Christopher Faylor wrote: >> > I approve this patch. >> > >> >> Great! Thank you very much. >> >> > * config/i386/mingw.mh, config/i386/mingw.mt: New files. >> > >> > * configure.tgt (i[34567]86-*-mingw32*): Set gdb_target = mingw. >> >> Could someone review these hunks? > >Chris's approval is good enough for me, and they look fine. > >I demand a NEWS entry, though :-) I think that's a good idea too but does this really get us to full MinGW support? cgf