From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-51442-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 19490 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2007 13:56:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 19361 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Oct 2007 13:56:27 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from pool-70-20-17-24.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO ednor.cgf.cx) (70.20.17.24)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:56:22 +0000
Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) 	id 931952B353; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:56:20 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:35:00 -0000
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Support of gdb for Windows 64 native systems
Message-ID: <20071016135619.GA24389@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
References: <20071014173921.GD11619@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <471259B2.6050808@portugalmail.pt> <20071014221603.GA13096@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20071014222252.GA13023@caradoc.them.org> <20071015184525.GI14543@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20071015185451.GA3934@caradoc.them.org> <4713F838.9050104@portugalmail.pt> <ur6jvitow.fsf@gnu.org> <20071016042121.GA22246@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4053daab0710160053v56c78dael4a8c732c3b7d70d7@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4053daab0710160053v56c78dael4a8c732c3b7d70d7@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00420.txt.bz2

On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 08:53:10AM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
>On 10/16/07, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 06:12:31AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> >> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:31:04 +0100
>> >> From: Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
>> >>
>> >> How about the attached?
>> >
>> >I have one concern:
>> >
>> >> -#include <sys/procfs.h>
>> >
>> >Why do you unconditionally remove this include?  Doesn't the Cygwin
>> >build want it?
>>
>> Actually, I wondered about this too and meant to ask.  I assume that it
>> isn't really needed?
>>
>
>I did explain it upthread:
>" - profs.h isn't needed anymore, since I've implemented cygwin cross-core
>support a few weeks ago (in i386-cygwin-tdep.c).  The include can be
>       unconditionally removed."

Oops.  I missed that.  Sorry.  Thanks for the (re)explanation.

I approve this patch.

cgf