From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17421 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2007 06:03:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 17413 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Oct 2007 06:03:14 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 06:03:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC2B1E6D52 for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 02:03:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id GuT6bf5g7PEg for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 02:03:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834321E6D4C for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 02:03:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 389BFE7B58; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 23:03:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:13:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [commit/branch?] error in return type in solib-target:solib_target_parse_libraries Message-ID: <20071013060308.GD4038@adacore.com> References: <20071012215533.GB4038@adacore.com> <20071013024857.GA21222@caradoc.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071013024857.GA21222@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00355.txt.bz2 > > 2007-10-12 Joel Brobecker > > > > * solib-target.c (solib_target_parse_libraries) > > [HAVEHAVE_LIBEXPAT not defined]: Fix thinko in return type. > > > > I think I should also commit this on the branch. > > Yes please. Thanks. Now checked in. > It looks like we'll need a 6.7.1 sooner rather than later; I really > screwed up this libintl PR. Which libintl PR? I'm doing zillions of things at the same time these days, so I'm wondering what I missed (or forgot!)... In terms of 6.7.1, I'm ready anytime. -- Joel