From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10111 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2007 17:59:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 10102 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Oct 2007 17:59:53 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:59:49 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l9BHxkx0001725; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:46 -0400 Received: from post-office.corp.redhat.com (post-office.corp.redhat.com [10.11.254.111]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l9BHxkHW031950; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:46 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (vpn-14-4.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.4]) by post-office.corp.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l9BHxjqP011634; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:46 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (greed.delorie.com [127.0.0.1]) by greed.delorie.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l9BHxjoI027098; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:45 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l9BHxjJS027095; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:45 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 18:00:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200710111759.l9BHxjJS027095@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: drow@false.org CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20071011165259.GA25130@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:52:59 -0400) Subject: Re: Adding libdecnumber to src References: <20071011161941.GF22982@caradoc.them.org> <200710111647.l9BGl4mI025281@greed.delorie.com> <20071011165259.GA25130@caradoc.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00306.txt.bz2 > Either way. Like libiberty would probably be easiest. Sure, I can add it to the libiberty job. Note that this means you'll have no direct control over it; all changes would have to go through gcc. Also, don't forget to update the top-level MAINTAINERS file accordingly.