From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1965 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2007 16:49:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 1955 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Oct 2007 16:49:51 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:49:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F172AD2EC; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:49:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 4cL4Pjbsvvdr; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:49:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F072AB7B8; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:49:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 34BAAE7B58; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:49:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:53:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Update ARI pages Message-ID: <20071011164944.GW3570@adacore.com> References: <000001c80b14$db947450$92bd5cf0$@u-strasbg.fr> <20071010120140.GB10228@caradoc.them.org> <002301c80bd8$051fc9f0$0f5f5dd0$@u-strasbg.fr> <20071011135418.GA16191@caradoc.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071011135418.GA16191@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00298.txt.bz2 > I don't even think this is worth doing. Does anyone else? The ARI > is a development tool; it's not important for release branches. I agree with Daniel. -- Joel