From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21143 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2007 17:18:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 21134 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Oct 2007 17:18:35 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 17:18:32 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFADB98336; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 17:18:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BB9980BD; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 17:18:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IewFR-00060r-Mz; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 13:18:29 -0400 Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 17:18:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] ARI fix: Remove asprintf in breakpoint.c Message-ID: <20071008171829.GA23098@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <009c01c809a5$c05be1c0$4113a540$@u-strasbg.fr> <20071008134219.GK3570@adacore.com> <00a001c809b2$56fc8ec0$04f5ac40$@u-strasbg.fr> <20071008150155.GM3570@adacore.com> <000501c809bf$49bd85e0$dd3891a0$@u-strasbg.fr> <20071008160904.GA19094@caradoc.them.org> <20071008162456.GP3570@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071008162456.GP3570@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00170.txt.bz2 On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 09:24:56AM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > As I said, if the stream of your patches is relatively small, > I don't mind doing the testing for you, since it's pretty automated > on my side. But if you are going to contribute a regular amount > of patches, it makes sense to invest the time in them. I've run the testsuite on Cygwin in the last couple of months and had no trouble. Pierre, how long does it take for you? I'll rerun and compare. I don't think it was more than an hour or two. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery