From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26497 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2007 16:09:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 26481 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Oct 2007 16:09:12 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:09:07 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826A1982FB; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 16:09:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D35980BD; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 16:09:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IevAG-0004yP-2N; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:09:04 -0400 Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:09:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pierre Muller Cc: 'Joel Brobecker' , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] ARI fix: Remove asprintf in breakpoint.c Message-ID: <20071008160904.GA19094@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pierre Muller , 'Joel Brobecker' , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <009c01c809a5$c05be1c0$4113a540$@u-strasbg.fr> <20071008134219.GK3570@adacore.com> <00a001c809b2$56fc8ec0$04f5ac40$@u-strasbg.fr> <20071008150155.GM3570@adacore.com> <000501c809bf$49bd85e0$dd3891a0$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000501c809bf$49bd85e0$dd3891a0$@u-strasbg.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00168.txt.bz2 On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 05:24:16PM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote: > Thanks for the approval, > committed. > > Concerning the overnight running of testsuites > with different patches, does anyone have some > script that automates this? No - but it's reasonable to test them together in a single test run, I think. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery