From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1638 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2007 13:56:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 1628 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Oct 2007 13:56:34 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 13:56:31 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9352998320; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 13:56:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E051980BD; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 13:56:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Iet5w-00032X-Fh; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 09:56:28 -0400 Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 13:56:00 -0000 From: 'Daniel Jacobowitz' To: Pierre Muller Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] adding gdb.pascal subdir: updated version Message-ID: <20071008135628.GA11631@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <001f01c7c87d$e64c5d60$b2e51820$@u-strasbg.fr> <20070717221704.GA8359@caradoc.them.org> <001501c7f19c$77e27330$67a75990$@u-strasbg.fr> <001901c7f19f$db34e780$919eb680$@u-strasbg.fr> <20071006154209.GA7600@caradoc.them.org> <005701c8097a$dd3ad6a0$97b083e0$@u-strasbg.fr> <20071008120341.GB4723@caradoc.them.org> <009b01c809a5$41099520$c31cbf60$@u-strasbg.fr> <20071008124215.GA6075@caradoc.them.org> <009e01c809b1$14926920$3db73b60$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <009e01c809b1$14926920$3db73b60$@u-strasbg.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00149.txt.bz2 On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:42:33PM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote: > By the way, is this dependent on the type of debug info generated? > Does stabs and dwarf both generate the wrong line number information? I don't know, but it's likely. My desktop is AMD64 so I can not really test stabs. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery