From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21063 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2007 16:20:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 21055 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Sep 2007 16:20:48 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:20:44 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9932AAD6F; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:20:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id FlqeetD51O89; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:20:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1C42A9F5C; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:20:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ADC76E7B58; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:20:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:20:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pierre Muller , 'Adriaan van Os' , gpc@gnu.de, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC-3] Handle GPC specific name for main function Message-ID: <20070927162039.GC3787@adacore.com> References: <000701c80089$815378f0$83fa6ad0$@u-strasbg.fr> <000801c8008e$0aa12c70$1fe38550$@u-strasbg.fr> <20070927060246.GB3787@adacore.com> <000001c800d8$21cbcf00$65636d00$@u-strasbg.fr> <46FB5E2C.6080606@microbizz.nl> <46FB5F76.9050501@microbizz.nl> <000001c800dc$14b0df00$3e129d00$@u-strasbg.fr> <20070927121107.GB27706@caradoc.them.org> <001b01c80102$e371af60$aa550e20$@u-strasbg.fr> <20070927124020.GA29185@caradoc.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070927124020.GA29185@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00410.txt.bz2 > > Anyhow, this can only lead to failures to detect > > GPC properly. I think that the patch, even if it might > > miss more cases, is also much more safe this way, because > > we only use (_p_MO__main_program or pascal_main_program) > > as start command breakpoint if '_p_initialize' was also found. > > Seems reasonable to me. Joel? Seems reasonable to me too. -- Joel