From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15362 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2007 12:08:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 15354 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Sep 2007 12:08:57 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:08:54 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536CD9832B; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:08:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2980C9829E; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:08:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IasAm-0007DB-Cj; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:08:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:08:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, "Maciej W. Rozycki" Subject: Re: hbreak.exp: Test hardware breakpoints Message-ID: <20070927120852.GA27706@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, "Maciej W. Rozycki" References: <20070921230133.GB28500@caradoc.them.org> <20070924113241.GA7618@caradoc.them.org> <20070926142137.GA29702@caradoc.them.org> <4053daab0709260729r4a419defs5f95d4b84c44bcc3@mail.gmail.com> <20070926155114.GA1306@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00404.txt.bz2 On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 10:58:21AM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Which is obviously a bug -- you should be able to debug a remote > i386-linux-gnu target with an i386-linux-gnu host using an i386-linux-gnu > native debugger if the "target remote" command is at all available, > shouldn't you? Yes, definitely. It's just a bit tangled up to fix because of all the different i386 targets. Maybe I'll give it a try. > > I'll build a cross debugger and give it a try tonight. > > Thanks. I didn't have time :-( I will take care of it as soon as I can, though. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery