From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8397 invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2007 10:45:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 8386 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Sep 2007 10:45:46 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:45:42 +0000 Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l8MAjXhZ027230; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 12:45:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l8MAjVEK009997; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 12:45:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:45:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200709221045.l8MAjVEK009997@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: drow@false.org CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20070921224321.GB27875@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:43:21 -0400) Subject: Re: What happended to sepdebug.exp? References: <200709092149.l89Ln4pK017577@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070909215527.GA22886@caradoc.them.org> <200709092225.l89MPnxe007011@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070921224321.GB27875@caradoc.them.org> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00297.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:43:21 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 12:25:49AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 17:55:27 -0400 > > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 11:49:04PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > On OpenBSD I'm seeing the following testsuite regression/freakout: > > > > > > I noticed something similar today while testing ia64-linux. > > > > > > > 1. The "PASS: debuglink: XXXX" look wrong to me, do people see those > > > > on other systems too? > > > > > > I've been meaning to fix this. > > > > Please do ;). > > Fixed as attached. Thanks!